Example 1: muscular build, higher BMI
Inputs: man, age 30, 180 cm, 88 kg, 82 cm waist, 40 cm neck.
- BMI = 88 ÷ 1.80² = 27.2 (overweight screening category).
- Deurenberg = 1.20 × 27.2 + 0.23 × 30 − 10.8 − 5.4 = 23.3% (acceptable fitness reference band).
- Navy = 86.010 × log10(32.28 − 15.75) − 70.041 × log10(70.87) + 36.76 = 11.9% (athlete reference band).
Interpretation: BMI and the Navy estimate disagree. A muscular build could raise BMI, while Deurenberg partly repeats BMI's limitation. Consistently repeated circumference data adds more composition context, though the 11.4-point method gap is a reason to remeasure rather than declare one exact value.
Example 2: normal BMI, elevated estimates
Inputs: woman, age 55, 168 cm, 60 kg, 88 cm natural waist, 32 cm neck, 105 cm hip.
- BMI = 60 ÷ 1.68² = 21.3 (healthy-weight screening category).
- Deurenberg = 1.20 × 21.3 + 0.23 × 55 − 5.4 = 32.8% (above the general reference band).
- Navy = 163.205 × log10(34.65 + 41.34 − 12.60) − 97.684 × log10(66.14) − 78.387 = 37.9% (above the general reference band).
Interpretation: The body-fat methods agree with each other but not with BMI. BMI may miss composition differences when lean mass is lower. The circumference estimate provides more specific context, but a clinician or a directly assessed method is more appropriate for health decisions.
The “Try muscular-build example” button loads Example 1 into the calculator so you can inspect its personalized result and gauges.