Batteries are slimming down
Battery manufacturing emissions have fallen ~70% since 2013 as factories moved to renewables and higher-yield cathodes. The “battery penalty” keeps shrinking.
Set to 0 if not replacing. If you do, this adds battery manufacturing emissions.
“Fuel CO₂” is tailpipe CO₂ per liter (approx.). Uplift adds upstream (well-to-tank) emissions.
Rounding changes only the display, not the math.
Friendly estimate only. Real-world results vary with driving style, speed, temperature, terrain, accessories, and energy supply.
All factors are editable so you can mirror a report or your local grid/fuel figures.
Comparing electric vehicles (EVs) and gasoline cars in terms of carbon emissions is more nuanced than it may first appear. While EVs have no tailpipe emissions, the electricity they consume still has an indirect carbon footprint depending on how it is generated. Gasoline cars, by contrast, emit carbon dioxide directly from burning fuel, and those emissions are typically higher per kilometer — but the manufacturing of batteries for EVs adds a front-loaded carbon cost. This calculator helps you visualize both sides of that trade-off.
Over the full life cycle of a vehicle, two main emission sources dominate: manufacturing and operation. Vehicle manufacturing includes the energy used to produce materials like steel, aluminum, and plastics, plus — for EVs — the additional energy and raw materials needed for battery production. Battery manufacturing typically emits between 60 and 120 kg CO₂ per kWh of capacity, though this depends on factory efficiency and energy mix. For a 60 kWh battery pack, that could mean 4–7 metric tons of CO₂ upfront.
Operational emissions depend on how the vehicle is powered in daily use. A gasoline car emits roughly 2.3 kg CO₂ per liter of fuel burned, with 10–20% additional upstream emissions from oil extraction, refining, and transport. EVs, on the other hand, emit based on grid intensity: if electricity comes from coal, emissions may approach 0.7 kg CO₂ per kWh; in renewables-dominated regions, it can be near zero. As power grids decarbonize over time, EVs tend to improve automatically, while gasoline vehicles cannot.
The break-even point is where an EV’s cumulative lifetime emissions fall below those of a comparable gasoline car. Depending on grid mix, vehicle size, and driving distance, this can occur anywhere from 10,000 to 60,000 km of driving. Beyond that point, the EV continues to offer lower ongoing emissions per km, with greater advantages in cleaner electricity regions or when paired with rooftop solar.
Ultimately, the goal is not perfection but awareness. Transparent comparisons like this one help drivers, planners, and policymakers understand where the biggest emission reductions can be achieved — and how technology, energy sources, and driving habits combine to shape the true environmental footprint of our mobility choices.
Battery manufacturing emissions have fallen ~70% since 2013 as factories moved to renewables and higher-yield cathodes. The “battery penalty” keeps shrinking.
Stop-and-go regen can recover 10–30% of urban energy, while idling gas cars burn fuel for zero km. That’s why EV per-km numbers often improve in traffic.
Many regions have cleaner night-time grids (nuclear, wind). Charging after midnight can cut EV CO₂ per km by another 20–40% vs. peak-time fossil-heavy mixes.
Oil extraction, shipping, and refining add roughly 15–25% on top of tailpipe CO₂. Accounting for that often moves the EV break-even tens of thousands of km earlier.
EV motors deliver peak torque from zero RPM, so most use a single-speed gearbox. Fewer moving parts means less maintenance—and slightly lower lifecycle emissions.