PPP is a made-up currency
The “international dollar” isn’t tradable—it's a reference unit that buys the same basket as a U.S. dollar would at home.
Tip If you have PPP conversion factors (LCU per international $) for both countries, use Conversion Factors. Otherwise use Price Indices + a nominal FX rate to infer a PPP-adjusted rate.
If CFA and CFB are PPP conversion factors (LCU per international $) for countries A and B:
AmountB = AmountA × (CFB / CFA)
Given a nominal FX rate E (LCUA per 1 LCUB) and price indices CPIA, CPIB (same base):
EPPP = E × (CPIA / CPIB) and
AmountB = AmountA / EPPP
Use consistent vintages/sources for factors or indices. PPP is for price-level comparison, not a forecast of market FX.
They express local currency units (LCU) per international dollar. If CFA is lower than CFB, A is relatively more expensive (higher price level) than B, all else equal.
It scales the nominal FX rate by the ratio of price indices (same base) to infer a PPP-consistent exchange rate. Then it converts your amount with that PPP rate.
You can, but mixing vintages may create inconsistencies. Prefer matched years/quarters and the same provider definitions.
All calculations run locally in your browser; nothing leaves your device.
The “international dollar” isn’t tradable—it's a reference unit that buys the same basket as a U.S. dollar would at home.
Global PPP surveys price thousands of everyday items—bread, rent, haircuts, even school fees—to build those conversion factors.
Tradable goods often track FX, but services swing PPP: a haircut can be 5–10× cheaper across borders.
On a PPP basis, some economies leapfrog others—India’s GDP jumps ahead of many when you adjust for local price levels.
National PPP hides city gaps: housing in capitals can erase the “cheap country” advantage compared to smaller towns.
Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) is a way to compare the price level of two economies so that money amounts reflect what people can actually buy locally, not just how currencies trade on foreign exchange markets. Market exchange rates are influenced by capital flows, risk sentiment, and policy; PPP instead focuses on relative prices of a common basket of goods and services. When you convert an amount using PPP, you are answering the question: “How much would I need in Country B to enjoy the same purchasing power as Amount A buys in Country A?”
1) Conversion factors (LCU per international dollar). Many statistical agencies publish a PPP conversion factor that tells you how many local currency units (LCU) equal one “international dollar,” a hypothetical unit with the same purchasing power as a U.S. dollar in the base year. If CFA and CFB are the factors for countries A and B, the PPP-equivalent of an amount in A into B is:
AmountB = AmountA × (CFB / CFA)
2) Price indices + nominal exchange rate. If you know a nominal FX rate E (LCUA per 1 LCUB) and comparable price indices (e.g., CPI) with the same base, you can form a PPP-implied exchange rate:
EPPP = E × (CPIA / CPIB) and AmountB = AmountA / EPPP
Absolute PPP compares price levels at a point in time (via conversion factors). Relative PPP compares rates of inflation over time and predicts that exchange rates tend to move in line with inflation differentials. This calculator focuses on absolute comparisons (and a simple relative approach via indices) to make results intuitive and transparent.
PPP is only as good as the inputs. Prefer matched years and a single source for both countries (e.g., national statistics offices, international agencies). Make sure your CPI series share the same base year (such as 2020=100). Mixing vintages or definitions can create artificial gaps. If your figures seem “off,” double-check whether you entered LCU per international dollar (not the other way around), and confirm that the FX rate direction matches the labels in this tool.
If the PPP-equivalent is higher than an FX conversion, Country B is relatively more expensive for that basket; if it’s lower, B is relatively cheaper. Treat PPP as a powerful lens for affordability and cross-country comparison—best used alongside, not instead of, market rates and local context.